“What I will commit is that I will obey all the rules of stare decisis, that if a question comes up before me about whether Casey or any other case should be overruled, that I will follow the law of stare decisis, applying it as the court is articulating it, applying all the factors, reliance, workability, being undermined by later facts in law, just all the standard factors,” she said during her confirmation hearing in October 2020.

Wade “is important precedent of the Supreme Court that has been reaffirmed many times.

Casey reaffirmed Roe and did so by considering the stare decisis factors,” he said in 2018.

It is not as if it is just a run-of-the-mill case that was decided and never been reconsidered, but Casey specifically reconsidered it, applied the stare decisis factors, and decided to reaffirm it.

Trump’s first nominee to the Supreme Court, refused to say how he would rule on abortion.

Wade, decided in 1973, is a precedent of the U.S.

The reliance interest considerations are important there, and all of the other factors that go into analyzing precedent have to be considered,” he told senators in March 2017.

Supreme Court worthy as treatment of precedent like any other.”.

Wade is an important precedent of the Supreme Court.

“If settled means that it is a precedent that is entitled to respect as stare decisis, and all of the factors that I’ve mentioned come into play, including the reaffirmation and all of that, then it is a precedent that is protected, entitled to respect under the doctrine of stare decisis in that way.”